Pressures from investors and regulators are accelerating the pace of convergence in traditional and alternative asset management organizations and improving standards of practice. At present, in the traditional asset management arena, managers’ and brokers’ records are generally compared on a trade-by-trade basis and custodians are authorized by the managers to settle matched transactions. In the hedge fund world, prime brokers, often serving as both trading counterparty and custodian, either settle trades without any affirmation or issue the affirmation on behalf of the manager. After tracing the historical development of these two de facto industry standards, Stone House Consulting partner Holly Miller comments on the role of the administrator, illustrates how the absence of trade matching increases hedge fund managers’ costs, explores why the hedge fund industry has accepted an error-prone process, and outlines a resolution. Read the full article published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Securities Operations & Custody here.
Filed under: Hedge Fund / Alternative Investment Management, Operational Risk, Published Article, Trading and Order Management, Traditional Investment Management, buy-side, errors, hedge fund, investment management, operational risk, operations, press, prime broker, recordkeeping, risk, separate accounts, trade ticket, workflow
